Origins Of The Framing Effect
In 1981, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky studied how various means of phrasing the same information influenced the responses to a hypothetically life and death situation .
The participants of the study were asked to choose between two options for treatment for 600 people afflicted with a fatal disease.
The first option was likely to result in the deaths of 400 people. The second option, on the other hand, had 66% possibility of everyone dying and a 33% possibility of no one dying.
These two options were then presented to the participants of the study with either a negative framing , or a positive framing .
Of the participants, 72% chose the first option for treatment when it was framed positively, i.e., as saving 200 lives. However, only 22% chose the same option when it was framed negatively, i.e., as resulting in the deaths of 400 people.
The results of the experiment demonstrated that choices which people make when they are offered options to choose from are influenced not merely by the substance of the information but also by the framing thereof.
What Is The Statement Of The Problem
A statement of the problem is used in research work as a claim that outlines the problem addressed by a study. The statement of the problem briefly addresses the question: What is the problem that the research will address? What are the goals of a statement of the problem?
Framing Effects On Online Security Behavior
- 1Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Seville, Spain
- 2Departamento de Análisis Económico: Teoría Económica e Historia Económica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- 3Center for Research in Social and Economic Behavior , Intelligent Data Analysis Laboratory , University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- 4Department of Psychology, School of Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
We conducted an incentivized lab experiment examining the effect of gain vs. loss-framed warning messages on online security behavior. We measured the probability of suffering a cyberattack during the experiment as the result of five specific security behaviors: choosing a safe connection, providing minimum information during the sign-up process, choosing a strong password, choosing a trusted vendor, and logging-out. A loss-framed message led to more secure behavior during the experiment. The experiment also measured the effect of trusting beliefs and cybersecurity knowledge. Trusting beliefs had a negative effect on security behavior, while cybersecurity knowledge had a positive effect.
Recommended Reading: What Does Span Mean Linear Algebra
What Is Framing Bias
Framing bias occurs when people make a decision based on the way the information is presented, as opposed to just on the facts themselves. The same facts presented in two different ways can lead to people making different judgments or decisions. In behavioral financeBehavioral FinanceBehavioral finance is the study of the influence of psychology on the behavior of investors or financial practitioners. It also includes the subsequent effects on the markets. It focuses on the fact that investors are not always rational, investors may react to a particular opportunity differently, depending on how it is presented to them. Learn more in CFIs Behavioral Finance Course!
The Framing Effect: The Role Of Amygdala In Mediating Appetitive
The Framing Effect is probably the best known example of the biasing effect of context on choice . This effect has been shown to play a key role in many different fields such as stock market forecasting , rate of organ donation and even international conflicts . In 2006 we designed an fMRI study that aimed to elucidate the neural computations associated with the framing effect . Volunteers that took part in the study were asked to make a decision between a safe option or a gamble matched in expected value . The critical manipulation consisted in the rewording of the safe option in the following way: Participants were told at the beginning of each trial that they had been given a certain amount of money to play with in that trial in half of the trials the safe option was either presented in a Gain frame by using the word Keep in the other half it was presented in a Loss frame using the word Lose .
Figure 5.3. Task. Participants were shown a message indicating the amount of money received to play in that trial . Subjects then had to choose between a sure or a gamble option presented in the context of two different frames. The sure option was formulated as either the amount of money retained from the initial starting amount or as the amount of money lost from the initial amount . The gamble option was identical in both frames and represented as a pie chart depicting the probability of winning or losing.
Kenway Louie, Benedetto De Martino, in, 2014
Don’t Miss: Movement Examples Geography
Framing As Gain Vs Loss
Below is the detail of an experiment carried out by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky.
A group of insurance professionals were charged with minimizing the loss of cargo on three insured barges that sank off the coast of Alaska. Each barge holds $200,000 worth of Cargo which will be lost if not salvaged within 72 hours.
Case 01 –They were given two options with identical costs.
- Plan A: This plan will save the cargo of one of the three barges, worth $200,000.
- Plan B: It has one-third probability of saving the cargo on all three barges worth $600,000, but a two-thirds probability of saving nothing.
As expected, seventy-one Percentage of respondents chose less risky plan A.
Case 02 –Then, Kahneman and Amos Tversky chose another group of insurance professionals and gave them different options.
- Plan C: This plan will result in the loss of two of the three cargoes, worth $400,000.
- Plan D: This plan has a two-thirds probability of resulting in the loss of all three cargoes but has a one-third probability of saving all the cargo of the entire $600,000.
This time though the 80% of respondents preferred plan D though it was similar to Plan B except for the way it is framed.
$200,000 gain vs $400,000 loss -Though both the plans were similar, the framing the option by loss influenced the peoples decisions. This is because by nature we focus on what we may lose than what we may gain. Our aversion to loss is a strong emotion.
Sociodemographic Information Of The Sample
Quotas were applied by sex and age. Their value was fixed according to the profile of the internet users provided by the Annual Survey of Access and Usage of ICT in Households and Individuals in 2013, where 51.7% of Internet users were men and that 40.6% of the Internet users were under 35 years of age. Age ranged between 19 and 69 years. Sixty percent of participants were older than 32 and the mean age was 36.9 years. We provide further sociodemographic information on the educational level and employment status of the participants in Table 1.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of participants1.
Don’t Miss: Valence Electrons In Ccl4
What Is The Behavioral Theory
Behaviorism or the behavioral learning theory is a popular concept that focuses on how students learn. … This learning theory states that behaviors are learned from the environment, and says that innate or inherited factors have very little influence on behavior. A common example of behaviorism is positive reinforcement.2
Framing Effect Example: Gas Mileage
Consider which is better for the environment:
- Adam switches from a car with 12mpg to a car with 14mpg.
- Barry switches from a car with 30mpg to a car with 40mpg.
Barrys move looks like a bigger jump but this is deceptive. If they both drive the same distance in a year, Adam will use 119 fewer gallons of gas, whereas Beth will cut her use by only 83 gallons. Rather than miles per gallon, the real metric that matters is gallons per mile, which inverts the mpg, and differences in fractions are less intuitive.
For an extreme, consider going from 1mpg to 2mpg vs 100mpg to 200mpg. Over 1000 miles, the former will save 500 gallons the latter, only 5!
In Psychology And Economics
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman have shown that framing can affect the outcome of choice problems , so much so that some of the classic axioms of rational choice are not true. This led to the development of prospect theory.
The context or framing of problems adopted by decision-makers results in part from extrinsic manipulation of the decision-options offered, as well as from forces intrinsic to decision-makers, e.g., their norms, habits, and unique temperament.
What Is Positive Framing In Psychology
Positive framing isnt spin or a denial of a negative event. It is a perspective that says there may be more to the outcome than just the current negative. Call it perspective, call it wisdom, call it patience in reality, it is a combination of all of those things. And in the positive frame, good things can happen.
Don’t Miss: Edgenuity Economics Unit Test Answers
Complete Guide On The Framing Effect With Its Meaning And Examples
Can our choices be influenced? Yes, because humans suffer from cognitive biases, and we often fall prey to the framing effect. We interpret and react to things differently, the way that they’re portrayed to us.
Can our choices be influenced? Yes, because humans suffer from cognitive biases, and we often fall prey to the framing effect. We interpret and react to things differently, the way that theyre portrayed to us.
The stumbling block isnt the certainty effect per se. Its the way that smart people are influenced by mere words, by the way the choices are framed. William Poundstone, Priceless: The Myth of Fair Value
A displeasing event at the start of your day puts you in a negative frame of mind, and makes you feel negative about the whole day. Everything goes wrong that day. Why is it so? Because, you see things through a particular frame that day. Hence, any small event which goes against your wish will tend to irk you.
Thus, we see things the way they are portrayed or framed to us. Lets go through a few examples of this framing effect.
Why Is The Framing Effectimportant
If framing can affect behavior,then we need to know when and how it is working on other people and ourselves.
If the same information is presenteddifferently can lead us to different behaviors, then we need to understand howthat works. We need to know when the framing effect influences people, and ifwe are being manipulated ourselves.
It is essential to understand framingbecause we can use it to be more influential and persuasive when talking toother people. We can also break down the messaging of competitors and peoplepromoting conflicting viewpoints.
We also can understand how thisaffects ourself. We may be making ineffective decisions if framing effects aredistorting our perception of the situation. We need to be on guard and stripaway the framing to look at the raw information if we are to make the bestdecisions. Just the facts, maam!
Also Check: Are Michael Jacksons Kids Biologically His
Why Is Framing Important In The Social Sciences
Framing is so effective because it is a heuristic, or mental shortcut that may not always yield desired results and is seen as a rule of thumb. According to Susan T. Fiske and Shelley E. Taylor, human beings are by nature cognitive misers, meaning they prefer to do as little thinking as possible.
Framing Effect In Politics: Crime In Addison
We are all used to spin inpolitics the maneuvering to take the same facts and frame them in the way thatbest plays to the political.
After political debates, candidatesand their staff go off into spin rooms where they try to frame whateveryone just saw in the most flattering manner.
But very subtle differences in a message can profoundly change peoples political views, as proven in a study out of Stanford.
In the study, 485 participants read apiece about crime in the fictional city of Addison. But there was a slightdifference for half of the participants. One set of participants read thatcrime was a beast preying on the municipality. The second half ofpeople read that crime was a virus infecting the town.
That slight rewording changed peoplesattitudes towards the correct response the city government should take.Participants that heard the frame beast preying reported wanting tosee more punishment of criminals, while those who read virusinfecting were more in favor of broader reforms.
The authors of the study, Paul H.Thibodeau and Lera Boroditsky, believe that readers can infer causes that areconsistent with the frame. Beast preying makes it sound like thecause of the lousy crime statistics is bad actors. But virusinfecting sets readers up to believe it is a systemic problem.
The Framing Effect Is Part Of Our Psychology
The reason framing informationaffects us is because of human nature.
If we didnt have the deal with ourpsychology, we would make the same decisions no matter how you frame theinformation.
But we are not. We have cognitivebiases, heuristics, and psychology built into our neurology.
Our understanding of the framingeffect and Prospect Theory come fromresearch into human psychology.
Frame Analysis As Rhetorical Criticism
Although the idea of language-framing had been explored earlier by Kenneth Burke , political communication researcher Jim A. Kuypers first published work advancing “framing analysis” as a rhetorical perspective in 1997. His approach begins inductively by looking for themes that persist across time in a text and then determining how those themes are framed. Kuypers’s work begins with the assumption that frames are powerful rhetorical entities that “induce us to filter our perceptions of the world in particular ways, essentially making some aspects of our multi-dimensional reality more noticeable than other aspects. They operate by making some information more salient than other information….”
In his 2009 work, Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action Kuypers offers a detailed template for doing framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective. According Kuypers, “Framing is a process whereby communicators, consciously or unconsciously, act to construct a point of view that encourages the facts of a given situation to be interpreted by others in a particular manner. Frames operate in four key ways: they define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgments, and suggest remedies. Frames are often found within a narrative account of an issue or event, and are generally the central organizing idea.” Kuypers’s work is based on the premise that framing is a rhetorical process and as such it is best examined from a rhetorical point of view.
Recommended Reading: Unit 1 Geometry Basics Homework 2 Segment Addition Postulate Answers
What Is The Prospect Theory Of Framing
According to the prospect theory developed by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1979, people evaluate their losses and acquire insights in an asymmetric fashion.
According to the theory, people are more influenced by the loss that they can acquire than the equivalent gains.
Herein, the framing effect becomes manifest when individuals are offered various options within the context of merely one of the frames according to Druckman
What Is An Example Of Design Thinking
Clean Team. There are many great examples of how design thinking has been applied to the social sector. This case study describes Clean Team, which applied design thinking to provide in-home toilets for Ghanas urban poor. Clean Team used design thinking to provide in-home toilets for Ghanas urban poor.
Read Also: How To Find Ksp From Molarity
What Is Cognitive Paradigm
What is the cognitive paradigm? The cognitive paradigm explores the inner workings of the mind, how people view experiences and interpret them. ” Sense making literature” People have schemas – frame of mind created by an accumulation of all their knowledge and experience. This changes how we see things.
What Is The Purpose Of Framing
Framing can make an image more aesthetically pleasing and keep the viewers focus on the framed object. It can also be used as a repoussoir, to direct attention back into the scene. It can add depth to an image, and can add interest to the picture when the frame is thematically related to the object being framed.
How To Avoid It
There are a few strategies for reducing the framing effect. Research has shown that people who are more involved on an issue are less likely to suffer from framing effects surrounding it. Involvement can be thought of as how invested you are in an issue. A 2010 study found that people who are involved with an issue are more motivated to systematically process persuasive messages and are more interested in acquiring information about the product than people who are less involved with the issue. More involved individuals were found to be less susceptible to the framing effect, whereas those who were less involved were more susceptible.
What we can take from these findings, is that we should think through our choices concerning an issue and try to become more informed on it. Indeed, the authors posit that previous literature has found that framing bias would be mitigated or eliminated if individuals thought more carefully about their choices and that when older adults examined more information relevant to the decision, they made more effective decisions.7
How To Guard Against The Framing Effect
From a quantitative perspective, perhaps the best advice is to remember that price does not necessarily indicate value. Framing is not always intentional and thus its important to consider the effect it might have on any decisions.
When trying to evaluate things critically, consider what frame youre looking through. Re-word the argument, particularly the argument of those who are trying to persuade you to choose something. As we can see in the framing effect examples given if you change the frame you make a different decision.
Have the awareness that everything that is communicated to you contains an element of framing. Every fact, even if you heard it from a reliable source, is subject to this bias. Even this blog post.
Want to pin this post for later?
Don’t Miss: Geometry Mcdougal Littell Answers